I thought this comment left on the review for Five O'Clock au Gingembre deserved it's own post:
From "Communication Parfums Serge Lutens":
"Serge Lutens, souhaiterait qu'un rectificatif soit apporté.
Il est l'auteur de ses parfums de A à Z (de l'essence de la fragrance, en passant par le design du flacon jusqu'au packaging...). Christopher Sheldrake est bien sûr associé à la conception de ces parfums mais en tant que technicien.
Pour Serge Lutens, il est important d'apporter ce rectificatif car ce genre d'information est source de confusion.
Elle peut être préjudiciable pour Christopher Sheldrake qui est engagé chez Chanel.
D'avance, nous vous remercions de votre attention et demeurons à votre disposition pour toute information complémentaire à ce sujet."
Rough translation (through Google.com):
"Serge Lutens, a correction would be made.
He is the author of its perfumes from A to Z (the essence of the fragrance, through the design of the bottle packaging until ...). Christopher Sheldrake is obviously involved in the design of these perfumes but as a technician.
For Serge Lutens, it is important to make this correction because such information is confusing.
It may be detrimental Christopher Sheldrake which is engaged in Chanel.
To advance, we thank you for your attention and remain at your disposal for any information on this subject."
Apparently Christopher Sheldrake is not the perfumer for the Serge Lutens fragrance line, but a mere technician. I wonder if anyone's told him that? I have never claimed that Mr. Lutens was anything less than a genius, but come on...let's give some credit where's it's due.
Here's my disclaimer - the information I provide on this site is considered general and public knowledge, as disclosed through various websites and publications.
Isn't it funny how dozens of glowing reviews for SL fragrances have been written on the site, but the one negative review gets a comment? I wonder what will come after my review for Miel du Bois?
Please leave a comment and share your thoughts.
[please note that comments are left with no actual verification, so this comment may have been left fraudulently]
From "Communication Parfums Serge Lutens":
"Serge Lutens, souhaiterait qu'un rectificatif soit apporté.
Il est l'auteur de ses parfums de A à Z (de l'essence de la fragrance, en passant par le design du flacon jusqu'au packaging...). Christopher Sheldrake est bien sûr associé à la conception de ces parfums mais en tant que technicien.
Pour Serge Lutens, il est important d'apporter ce rectificatif car ce genre d'information est source de confusion.
Elle peut être préjudiciable pour Christopher Sheldrake qui est engagé chez Chanel.
D'avance, nous vous remercions de votre attention et demeurons à votre disposition pour toute information complémentaire à ce sujet."
Rough translation (through Google.com):
"Serge Lutens, a correction would be made.
He is the author of its perfumes from A to Z (the essence of the fragrance, through the design of the bottle packaging until ...). Christopher Sheldrake is obviously involved in the design of these perfumes but as a technician.
For Serge Lutens, it is important to make this correction because such information is confusing.
It may be detrimental Christopher Sheldrake which is engaged in Chanel.
To advance, we thank you for your attention and remain at your disposal for any information on this subject."
Apparently Christopher Sheldrake is not the perfumer for the Serge Lutens fragrance line, but a mere technician. I wonder if anyone's told him that? I have never claimed that Mr. Lutens was anything less than a genius, but come on...let's give some credit where's it's due.
Here's my disclaimer - the information I provide on this site is considered general and public knowledge, as disclosed through various websites and publications.
Isn't it funny how dozens of glowing reviews for SL fragrances have been written on the site, but the one negative review gets a comment? I wonder what will come after my review for Miel du Bois?
Please leave a comment and share your thoughts.
[please note that comments are left with no actual verification, so this comment may have been left fraudulently]
3 comments: